In creative work, we must be able to rely on our tools. We handle sensitive client work, unreleased projects, and personal data, all of which require the highest level of security and confidentiality. That’s why a recent change in WeTransfer's terms of service sent shockwaves through the industry, leaving many to question whether their content was being used to train AI.
The uproar was swift and loud, and for good reason. Let's break down what happened, why it matters, and what you can do to protect your work.
The Spark: WeTransfer’s Controversial New Terms
WeTransfer, a service many creatives have relied on for years, rolled out an update to its terms of service that included a deeply concerning clause. The new terms granted WeTransfer an "unlimited, worldwide, royalty-free, transferable, and sublicensable license to all intellectual property rights" for the content users uploaded.
This license wasn't just for operating the service; it was for "the development and marketing of new technologies and services," including the right to "resell, publish, broadcast, or otherwise publicly perform the content." To make matters worse, the user granting the license—not necessarily the rights holder—would be liable for any claims.
The most alarming part? The terms explicitly mentioned using your files for machine learning training.
Here’s a look at the controversial clause that caused the firestorm:
The Interim Clause (Now Withdrawn):
6.3. License to WeTransfer. To allow us to operate, provide you with, and improve the service and our technologies (and to develop new ones), we must obtain from you certain rights related to content that is covered by intellectual property rights. You hereby grant us a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable license to use your content for the purposes of operating, developing, commercializing, and improving the service or new technologies or services, including to improve the performance of machine learning models that enhance our content moderation process, in accordance with the Privacy & Cookie Policy. Such license includes the right to reproduce, distribute, modify, prepare derivative works based upon, broadcast, communicate to the public, publicly display, and perform content. You will not be entitled to compensation for any use of content by us under these Terms. The processing of personal data is always carried out in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy, which provides further details on the purposes and legal bases for such processing.
The Backlash: A Breach of Trust
For professionals, these terms were more than just legal jargon—they were a direct threat to their livelihood. Post-production professional Ashley Lynch articulated the problem perfectly on Bluesky, pointing out the direct conflict with standard industry Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs).
Her post highlights a critical point: using WeTransfer under these terms would mean violating legal agreements with clients, putting careers and reputations at risk.
WeTransfer Retreats and Apologizes
The intense backlash from the creative community had an effect. WeTransfer quickly backtracked, withdrawing the controversial clause and issuing an apology for the "confusion caused."
They clarified their position, stating, “We do not use machine learning or any form of AI to process content shared via WeTransfer. Content will also not be sold to third parties.”
Here is the new, much shorter clause now in their terms:
The Completely New Clause:
6.3. License to WeTransfer. To allow us to operate, provide you with, and improve the service and our technologies, we must obtain from you certain rights related to content that is covered by intellectual property rights. You hereby grant us a royalty-free license to use your content for the purposes of operating, developing, and improving the service, all in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy.
While this is a step in the right direction, the incident has irrevocably damaged the trust many creatives had in the platform.
So, Does WeTransfer Use Your Content to Train AI?
Officially, no. WeTransfer has publicly stated they do not use your content for AI training and has removed the language from their terms. However, the fact that they attempted to introduce such a clause in the first place has left a lasting scar. Can you trust a service that was willing to claim such broad rights over your intellectual property? For many, the answer is a firm no.
Secure, Professional Alternatives to WeTransfer
This controversy is a powerful reminder of the importance of choosing tools that respect your content and your clients. If you're looking for alternatives, you're in luck. There are excellent services out there built with the needs of creative professionals in mind.
Framebird: More Than Just a File Transfer
If you want to not only share your work but also present it beautifully and professionally, Framebird is the answer. Instead of sending clients a cold download link, Framebird lets you create stunning, private galleries where clients can view, comment on, and approve your work directly.
It's a seamless experience that elevates your brand and streamlines your workflow. You get secure file sharing, client proofing, and professional presentation all in one platform.
Drop-In Replacements
If you’re just looking for a simple, one-to-one replacement for WeTransfer's core functionality, consider these options with more creator-friendly terms:
- Smash: (https://fromsmash.com) Offers a very similar user experience to WeTransfer without the scary terms.
- Swisstransfer: (https://www.swisstransfer.com) Another excellent alternative that prioritizes privacy, hosted in Switzerland.
Conclusion: Your Content, Your Control
The WeTransfer incident is a critical lesson for all creatives. The tools we choose matter. Always read the terms of service and opt for platforms that are transparent, secure, and built to empower you, not exploit your work. Trust is hard to win and easy to lose, and in the world of digital tools, it's everything.
